<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheets/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Mad Prime: The scientific kitty</title>
    <link>http://www.madprime.org/articles/2007/04/22/the-scientific-kitty</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>The scientific kitty</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As Schr&#246;dinger so &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schrodinger%27s_cat"&gt;famously demonstrated&lt;/a&gt;, whenever one is illustrating fundamental scientific principles, the optimum choice for such an illustration is a cat. In that spirit, I'd like to present one of my favorite examples of how fundamental biology phenomena are visible in our everyday life.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Some background: &lt;strong&gt;Gene copy number is important.&lt;/strong&gt; Variations in gene copy number are, perhaps, a subtle sort of problem -- having 50% more or less copies of a gene available for expression is conceivably a minor thing in the biochemical world, where feedback loops regulate gene expression to increase or decrease as necessary. (That's why so many disorders are recessive; as long as one functional copy of a gene exists, things seem to work fine.) Nevertheless, the duplication or deletion of entire chromosomes has a severe effect. Within the &lt;strong&gt;autosomes&lt;/strong&gt; (non-sex chromosomes), no cases of chromosome loss are viable. The only &lt;em&gt;extra&lt;/em&gt; chromosome that is mild enough to be viable in humans is trisomy 21, which causes &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.com/wiki/Down_syndrome"&gt;Down syndrome&lt;/a&gt;. Chromosome 21 is the smallest autosome.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Because of this, when it comes to the sex chromosomes, mammals are faced with a copy number problem. Males (XY) have only one copy of the X chromosome, while females (XX) have two. The ways biology addresses this issue is called "&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dosage_compensation"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;dosage compensation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;". In mammals, dosage compensation is achieved by randomly inactivating all but one X chromosome in all cells. Thus, regardless of an animal being male or female, only one X chromosome is active in any given cell.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This X-inactivation occurs early in embryonic development. Once a cell has decided to inactivate a given X chromosome, that decision is inherited by all its daughter cells. As a result, female mammals exist as a "mosaic" of X-inactivations -- in their bodies, whole patches of tissue have one or the other X inactivated.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;An interesting consequence of X-inactivation is that, unlike genes on other chromosomes, only one allele of a gene on the X chromosome is expressed in any given cell. This phenomenon is easily visible in tortoiseshell cats -- tortoiseshell coloration arises from X-inactivation, so these cats are almost always female. The coat color gene, which has alleles for orange or black coats, exists on the X chromosome. Because of X-inactivation, only one of the two genes is active in various patches of skin, giving rise to a pattern of orange and black patches.  Since the process of X-inactivation is random, this pattern of patches is random.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;IMG SRC=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Long-haired_tortoiseshell_DSCF0193.JPG width=450 align=center&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I love this example of X-inactivation so much, I added a picture of a kitty to the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-inactivation"&gt;wikipedia page on X-inactivation&lt;/a&gt;. It's always cool to have a everyday visualization of what would otherwise be an abstract genetic and developmental phenomenon.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:46:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:f2f1ca1c-025d-4323-9186-80817797c713</guid>
      <author>Madeleine Ball</author>
      <link>http://www.madprime.org/articles/2007/04/22/the-scientific-kitty</link>
      <category>development</category>
      <category>cats</category>
      <category>genetics</category>
      <category>biology</category>
      <trackback:ping>http://www.madprime.org/articles/trackback/2630</trackback:ping>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
