<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/stylesheets/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Mad Prime: Tag giraffes</title>
    <link>http://www.madprime.org/articles/tag/giraffes</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <title>Tall Tales</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Science magazine had &lt;A  HREF=http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/319/5860/146b&gt;an article&lt;/A&gt; exploring a paradoxical observation: acacia trees fenced off and protected from herbivores seem to be less healthy. It turns out the acacia trees are usually in a symbiotic relationship with a species of ant that protects them. When nobody's munching on the trees, they stop providing for the ants and the symbiotic relationship breaks down -- in a way that's actually worse, in the end, for the acacia.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then I started wondering, tangentially, if giraffes and acacias coevolved tallness. So I googled around... what I actually found was some surprising controversy regarding the evolution of the giraffe's neck.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Everyone pretty much assumed they evolved tall necks to reach more leaves, but in 1996 a couple of guys proposed that the neck was actually &lt;A HREF=http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-0147(199611)148%3A5%3C771%3AWBANSS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-A&gt;a product of sexual selection&lt;/A&gt;. Turns out that the males use their necks as weapons when fighting each other. Check out this crazy youtube video. (url: &lt;A HREF=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7HCIGFdBt8 &gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7HCIGFdBt8 &lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;object width="425" height="350"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/C7HCIGFdBt8"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/C7HCIGFdBt8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The argument they had against the feeding hypothesis was that giraffes spend a lot of time browsing at or below shoulder level. In 2007 &lt;A HREF=http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/509940&gt;another group published a study&lt;/A&gt; which found that higher quality biomass was available to giraffes higher up, due to competition with other foragers at lower levels. In the end I think I'll stick with the tall-to-reach-leaves-hypothesis, but I thought this video of fighting giraffes was too awesome not to share.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:995a4c78-3571-4a92-ada4-21bdf77804a6</guid>
      <author>Madeleine Ball</author>
      <link>http://www.madprime.org/articles/2008/01/16/tall-tales</link>
      <category>biology</category>
      <category>evolution</category>
      <category>giraffes</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
